Physics Buzz

A precious resource has been returned to thousands of physicists attending this year’s APS March Meeting. Yesterday marked the start of one of the largest physics conferences in the world, but the security settings on arXiv did not know this. The arXiv is an online repository for preprints of scientific papers covering studies in mathematics, physics, astronomy, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics and quantitative finance. When over 9,000 scientists using the meeting’s complementary WiFi tried accessing their trusty scientific paper repository, the arXiv’s security turned on and denied them access. Luckily, developer of arXiv, Paul Ginsparg, was notified of the problem and earlier this morning scientists at Cornell University lifted the block. One of the ways that websites identify hacking attacks is when a large number of requests from a single Internet Protocol (IP) address attempt to access the site over a short period of time. Such was the case on Monday, March 3

Featured films are as much of a tradition during the holidays as wrapping paper and eggnog. Classics like “A Christmas Story,” “How the Grinch Stole Christmas,” and “Miracle on 34th Street” juxtapose each holiday season’s new releases like this year’s “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” and Disney’s “Frozen.” When deciding whether to see this year’s hottest action thriller or heart-warming romance, hundreds of millions will navigate to the Internet Movie Database, IMDb, to read synopses, reviews and ratings. Using IMDb data, including user ratings and film budgets, a team of Northwestern University researchers suggests that a film’s prominence depends more on its budget than its quality. Credit: IMDb.com

Imagine that you begin your day at an auction, purchasing a myriad of equipment for your laboratory. You then spend the afternoon recording data on the radioactive half-life of uranium, and you end the evening by looking at your tax return. The prices you paid for the auction items, the values comprising your research data and the depressing numbers on your tax return all follow a pattern called Benford’s law. Benford’s law describes the frequency of leading digits. Lower numbers such as one or two appear as the first digit more often than higher numbers, and the fall-off frequency follows a logarithmic scale. Meaning that more than 50 percent of the prices you paid for the auction items will likely begin with the number one, two or three. Research indicates that the same rule applies to large samples of numbers describing radioactive half-lives, tax returns, statistical physics distributions, geological stream-flow rates and more. Credit: Alberto G. Numerous numerical datasets

Imagine diving into the placid surface of a painting by Vermeer, parsing apart Klimt's bejeweled surfaces, or untangling Jackson Pollock's knots of paint. Art historians, collectors, and restoration scholars have long sought to uncover the methods of great painters. Over the past decade, scientists have peered with light beneath the varnished surface of paintings to discover the chemistry of pigments, to identify the authors of unsigned works, or probe the crack depths from damage or age. Now, researchers at the University of Barcelona in Spain have used light at terahertz frequencies to uncover the hidden carbon signature of a painting previously thought to be unsigned. Though unsigned, the painting has been studied by art historians and confirmed to be painted by the Spanish artist Goya in 1771. Such secondary validation made the piece an apropos choice by the researchers, who published their findings May 14, 2013 on the arXiv .  "Sacrifice to Vesta" at three

In a science-savvy hack of Micosoft's Xbox Kinect, scientists are putting control of single molecules, cells and even strands of DNA in the palm of your hands. In a paper published on the arXiv , Craig McDonald, David McGloin and their colleagues at the University of Dundee, are using the Kinect to manipulate optical tweezers-- intensely focused beams of light that can trap, move and rotate microscopic particles. They call it HoloHands. The intuitive Kinect control of optical tweezers and other scientific tools has the potential to make these tools accessible to a broader audience that includes interdisciplinary scientists, schools, and museums, the scientists say. Frame from video of HoloHands. Image Source: arXiv . When Microsoft released the software development platform for Kinect in 2011, they opened up the kind of crowd-sourced development that Apple achieved by allowing anyone to develop Apps (see Make 's point on why this might not be as successful as the app st

Almost one year ago, several physicists from Imperial College London and the University of London released one of the most highly-praised papers on the foundations of quantum mechanics in recent years. Essentially, the researchers had provided strong evidence that the quantum state is, in fact, real. Furthermore, this suggested that the quantum state is not merely a reflection of an observer's knowledge of a system, as some physicists and philosophers have argued. Image courtesy Cornell University Library/ Arxiv.org Terry Rudolph, one of the authors of the paper, decided to submit his paper to perhaps the most prominent interdisciplinary scientific journal: Nature . Additionally, he posted his work to the popular arXiv preprint server. After reaching a very late stage in the editorial process, the paper was rejected. The reason, according to Nature, was follow-up research that Rudolph posted on the arXiv which cast doubt on the original research. Rudolph, however, thought th

Earlier today, some big names in the world of science journalism started a fascinating discussion on Twitter about reporting from the arXiv preprint server for physics papers. Because these papers usually have yet to be peer-reviewed (or may never be peer-reviewed), several questions naturally arose during the discussion. How can a journalist trust one of these papers? What steps should reporters take to verify the claims in an arXiv paper, and should the process differ from reporting on a peer-reviewed article? How much faith should reporters place in the peer-review process? As a writer who frequently writes about papers from the arXiv, I've grown to appreciate this gold mine of often undiscovered physics research. But it can also be a tomb for dubious papers and speculative musings. Consequently, I decided to do a quick (non-scientific) analysis of arXiv articles to see which categories (e.g. astrophysics or high energy physics) may have more articles that are eventually pe

Today, Greek politicians are trying to bring a number of disparate parties together to form a new government after recent elections. Meanwhile, the expected leaders of the new government hope to negotiate new terms for a previously arranged bailout from the European Union, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, according to the New York Times . The economy has tanked in Greece, and it's certainly affected research spending there as well. In April, Physics Today spoke to many Greek scientists for their thoughts on recent budget cuts and consolidations. They weren't optimistic, and reading their responses prompted me to look deeper into how much countries fund research and development around the world – and how that has changed in recent years. While the global statistics regarding science funding can be interesting by themselves, visualizing them in graphs, charts and infographics can truly illuminate the situation. A comparison of research and de

Uncovering historical trends can be a bit of a dark art. But in recent years, engineers and researchers have made it easy for the general public to quickly search through enormous sets of data. Google's Ngram viewer , for instance, allows users to compare word usage since 1800 in its massive digital library of books. Ngram is pretty simple: input some words or phrases that you want to compare (e.g. "the Beatles," "Albert Einstein," and "Elvis Presley,"), pick a time range and press enter. Google then outputs a nice looking graph of the relative popularity of these terms in books throughout a given time period. If you haven't already, give it a try! While the Ngram Viewer has been around for over a year, a similar project that tracks trends in scientific papers was recently unveiled. Called bookworm arXiv , this new tool works just like Ngram, but it searches through preprints of academic papers that scientists have posted on arXiv.org. Now it