tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-80337374562171733422008-03-27T06:35:00.000-04:002008-03-27T06:35:00.000-04:002008-03-27T06:35:00.000-04:00Intelligent design is not necessarily a religious belief. You don't have to believe in a god or higher being to believe in intelligent design. Plus, you make it sound like there is irrefutable evidence for evolution, and yet it is still called a "Theory" and not a law. There is a way to be unbiased, because I personally have argued both theories and made unbiased, scientific facts for both. Just because a state employee at a public school teaches or mentions intelligent design doesn't mean that they are breaking the "separation of Church and State," they are just informing their students on the two most popular theories on how we got here, and how the world was created. I think that if the Catholic Church will try to make peace with the scientific community and lend their support to the idea of evolution and go halfway and say that it is a possibility, then why can't the scientific community go half way and say that the theory of intelligent design/creationism is also a possibility, especially since there is no proof to disprove intelligent design either(which by the way, was one of your arguments on why evolution was right) Both of these ideas are theories, not laws, so why does the scientific community continue to treat one like its a law and the other as if its just the religious communities trying to keep the human race suppressed. Start being "True" to the scientific thought process and open your mind to all possibilities till they are proven absolutely wrong or absolutely right.Appstate06http://www.blogger.com/profile/07303565616701005458noreply@blogger.com