tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post1671588602827662746..comments2008-04-13T18:29:58.479-04:00Agent Utahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01241555892542544532noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-4406160003865261412008-04-13T18:29:00.000-04:002008-04-13T18:29:00.000-04:00what a bunch of rubbish! Evolution isn't even backed by the science, contrary to what dogmatic evolutionists used to think www.darwinismrefuted.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-80337374562171733422008-03-27T06:35:00.000-04:002008-03-27T06:35:00.000-04:00Intelligent design is not necessarily a religious belief. You don't have to believe in a god or higher being to believe in intelligent design. Plus, you make it sound like there is irrefutable evidence for evolution, and yet it is still called a "Theory" and not a law. There is a way to be unbiased, because I personally have argued both theories and made unbiased, scientific facts for both. Just because a state employee at a public school teaches or mentions intelligent design doesn't mean that they are breaking the "separation of Church and State," they are just informing their students on the two most popular theories on how we got here, and how the world was created. I think that if the Catholic Church will try to make peace with the scientific community and lend their support to the idea of evolution and go halfway and say that it is a possibility, then why can't the scientific community go half way and say that the theory of intelligent design/creationism is also a possibility, especially since there is no proof to disprove intelligent design either(which by the way, was one of your arguments on why evolution was right) Both of these ideas are theories, not laws, so why does the scientific community continue to treat one like its a law and the other as if its just the religious communities trying to keep the human race suppressed. Start being "True" to the scientific thought process and open your mind to all possibilities till they are proven absolutely wrong or absolutely right.Appstate06http://www.blogger.com/profile/07303565616701005458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-87324946392755954432007-12-18T10:31:00.000-05:002007-12-18T10:31:00.000-05:00Upon reading more of the evolutionnews.org website that I posted a link to (above) I realized that it's title is deceptive. This is clearly a website dedicated to defending those who support creationism and intelligent design. Not with the 'freedom of religion' and 'free thought' type of defense, but the heavily biased 'news' article defense. Deceptive title, if you ask me! <BR/><BR/>Still, it's hard to keep perspective on the truth when you know you disagree with someone before they have the chance to speak.Agent Utahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01241555892542544532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-63618418987976227132007-12-15T15:46:00.000-05:002007-12-15T15:46:00.000-05:00I think this is where Evolution needs to a bit of a helping hand .. creationists should not reproduce. It'll do the species a lot of good, I think.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35187314.post-10717312844736552152007-12-05T10:49:00.000-05:002007-12-05T10:49:00.000-05:00More news about the professor in Iowa who was denied tenure:<BR/>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/12/how_eli_rosenberg_chair_of_isu.html<BR/><BR/>The plot thickens.Agent Utahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01241555892542544532noreply@blogger.com