Skip to main content

New Study Finds the Proton to be Surprisingly Light

Imagine hefting a liter of water in your hands. That's a kilogram of weight. Divide that by a billion, and you've got a quantity called a microgram—a thousandth of a single milligram. Divide that amount by a billion, and you've got a femtogram—which it's almost impossible to get an intuitive sense for. But divide by a billion yet again, you've got roughly the mass of a single proton—and that's what scientists have measured with unprecedented precision in a surprising new experiment at the Max Planck Institute in Germany.

Cutting-edge measurements have revealed the proton to be lighter than previously thought.
Image Credit: Gernot Vogt/Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics

So how do we measure a quantity that tiny? Hopefully you recognize that the image above has some artistic license to it—a beam balance definitely isn't going to cut it. To examine the mass of a proton, researchers use a complex arrangement of electromagnetic fields called a Penning trap, the same kind of containment field used to trap and study antimatter without touching it.

A magnetic field curves the trajectory of a charged particle moving through it into a circular path, but since the electric field of the Penning trap keeps the protons roughly in one place, oscillating back and forth along the axis of this orbit, they end up tracing out something that looks more like a helix.

The size of that circle (and how long the proton takes to complete a loop), compared to the strength of the trap's magnetic field, is what tells us about the charge-to-mass ratio of the proton, and since the proton's charge is defined very precisely, this allows for a similarly precise calculation of its mass. The system is calibrated by performing the same experiment with a carbon nucleus, which is the reference point for the definition of atomic mass.

This experiment had a record-setting level of precision, and its findings were surprising: the proton is lighter than we expected. It's a miniscule difference, a few parts in a hundred million, but that still puts the new measurement outside the error bars on the previous figure, an average of several measurements from experiments of different types.

If future experiments with different methods disagree significantly with the new result, it might point to new physics underlying mass and its relationship to charge. For instance, if a trend emerges of the proton continuing to "lose weight", it might signal variation in the fundamental physical constants that determine things like the charge-to-mass ratio. At present, though, it's most likely that we've simply reached an extraordinary fine value for this mind-bendingly small number.

—Stephen Skolnick

Comments

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know:
"What's going on in this video? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream.

(We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux)

Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?