Skip to main content

Experimental Results Hint at Fifth Fundamental Force

Last week, we reported on a new theory by Dr. Jonathan Feng and collaborators, slated to appear in Physical Review Letters, which postulated a fifth fundamental force of nature. Exciting as this work is, our piece contained some errors and gave altogether the wrong impression, suggesting that the experimental work that served as the basis for this new theory might not be reliable. PhysicsCentral would like to apologize to our readers for this miscommunication, and in particular to Dr. Feng, as well as to the Atomki research group whose discovery of unusual features in the decay of Beryllium-8 atoms laid the groundwork for the new theory.

The Atomki group’s research, also published in Physical Review Letters several months prior, reported the occasional observation of an unusually high degree of separation between particles of matter and antimatter created by the decay of Beryllium-8. This finding is at odds with the traditional picture of Beryllium-8 decay—something like 99.9% of the time, the electron and its antimatter counterpart, a positron, are picked up very close to one another. The other one time in a thousand or so, however, the spread is much greater, suggesting that dynamics beyond the Standard Model may be at play.

Now, UC Irvine physicist Dr. Jonathan Feng and his co-authors Bart Fornal, Iftah Galon, Susan Gardner, Jordan Smolinksy, Tim Tait, and Philip Tanedo may have the explanation: a new, as-yet-undiscovered particle, tentatively named the X boson. The X boson would act as an intermediate particle, carrying away excess energy resulting from Beryllium-8’s decay before turning into a positron/electron pair—a job ordinarily performed by high-energy photons. The X boson, having mass and therefore moving much more slowly than the photon, could account for the unusual positron/electron spread.

This hypothetical new particle would have some unusual properties, and has caused something of a stir in the physics community as a result—in order to properly explain the Atomki group’s results, the X boson would interact exclusively with the neutrons in an atom’s nucleus. This never-before-seen property is being called protophobia, denoting the particle’s apparent tendency to avoid protons in favor of the equally massive but electrically-neutral neutrons.

The reason this proposition has sparked so much discussion is that no combination of the four known fundamental forces of nature—gravity, electromagnetism, and the nuclear strong & weak forces—produces this property of protophobia. If Dr. Feng’s theory is correct, it would mean that there are other, as-yet-undiscovered forces playing a role in the decay of Beryllium-8. Should this prove true, it would have enormous implications for future theories and experiments, potentially providing tools to study phenomena that have thus far proven elusive, such as dark matter.

Experiments that should either affirm or refute the possibility of a protophobic X boson are already underway, so keep an eye out for further news on developments in this story—we’ll keep you posted here at PhysicsCentral.

Comments

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know:
"What's going on in this video? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream.

(We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux)

Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?