Skip to main content

Fun With Science Leads to an Arrest store
As soon as I heard about Kiera Wilmot's science experiment gone wrong I thought "wow, that so could have been me when I was her age." For those of you that have not yet read about it, Ms. Wilmot was a curious science student and decided to do an experiment outside of class.  She mixed household chemicals in a water bottle and screwed the top back on just to see what would happen, thinking they would produce some smoke.  The bottle then exploded, with a "pop", and Wilmot was then expelled from school and arrested for discharging a weapon on school grounds.  No one was hurt, no property was even damaged, it affected no one.  I'm not saying her choice of venue wasn't monumentally stupid, but I am very upset that doing an unauthorized science experiment on school grounds ended in arrest and expulsion.  She can no longer attend her school and her college plans are possibly in jeopardy all because she was curious.  As someone who spends their life trying to get people excited and curious it really ticks me off when these traits are rewarded with an arrest warrant. 

I think there are very few that would argue that this case is ridiculous.  Reading the comments on any one of the numerous articles written about he incident makes that clear.  But what isn't being said is the toll it may be taking on potential future scientists.  When curiosity is publicly rewarded with an arrest, this isn't helping to create budding scientists, its telling people that science is dangerous and scary and should only be done only under a teacher's supervision.  Personally, I find the most disturbing part of all the coverage to be the fact that the line: "science teachers at the school said they knew nothing about it" is repeated in every article as if to say "if it was a real science experiment, the teachers would have to be involved."  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The best science experiments are the ones done in kitchens, in back yards, in garages and in fields. 

I want to be clear that I'm not endorsing risky behavior.  There are many things that can be dangerous and it is easy for a science experiment to go wrong. Heck, I'm the poster child for that having accidentally electrocuted my boss on her first day (no permanent harm was done).  It is important to take safety precautions when doing any science experiment, particularly when there might be big bangs.  However, as far as I can tell from the articles, Ms. Wilmot did things pretty safely with the exception of it being on schools grounds.  The bottle was in an open field, there was no one around and she expected only smoke.  If she had used a soda bottle instead of a water bottle, most likely nothing would have happened.  Soda bottles are much stronger than water bottles because soda is pressurized.  If she'd done it in her front yard there would have been no issue.  But hands on learning and exploring in a school yard, nope, not allowed.  Do real science on your own time in your house, not in school. 

I was a kid that grew up exploring.  I couldn't stop touching or taking things apart or putting things together the wrong way around just to see what happened.  I am now a PhD physicist because my parents encouraged my constant need to know.  I now try and foster that need in others.  I hate to see that spirit of exploration and need to know what's going to be stamped out because it wasn't done under a teacher's supervision in a classroom.   If I was in trouble every time I tried to melt my Barbies with a magnifying glass or got arrested for setting off model rockets in the field near my house I would certainly have been an English major. 

I hope that Ms. Wilmot continues her science experiments though in her own yard and not on school property and I wish there was something I could do to keep her playing with science.  Personally, I'm sending her some comics and posters and a note begging her to stay curious because scientific curiosity could also end in a trip to Sweden and not just a trip to juvie. 


  1. She lives in an apartment building without a yard. The school's open field was probably the only place she can conduct these experiments.

  2. Zero tolerance at work. Anything out of the ordinary OR that offends someone OR that some lawyer could sue over will be stopped.


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know: "What's going on in this video ? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream. (We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux ) Image Credit: St0rmz via Flickr Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?