Skip to main content

Podcast: The Particle at the End of the Universe

This week on the podcast I interview Sean Carroll, theoretical physicist and author of the new book The Paritcle at the End of the Universe: How the Hunt for the Higgs Boson Leads Us to the Edge of a New World.

This particle at the end of the universe is none other than the Higgs boson, the particle that gives many elementary particles their mass. I talked with Carroll about why non-scientists should care about the Higgs and what kind of awesome new physics it might introduce us to. Plus, he shares the three most common misconceptions people have about the Higgs boson, and explains why, even though life as we know it would not exist without it, the Higgs is not responsible for most of the mass in your body.

I really like this book. Pick it up if you're interested in learning about the Higgs, or just as a nice introduction to particle physics. While much of the physics you need to know to understand the Higgs boson has been around for many years (and Carroll does an excellent job laying out some of the really messy stuff), the story of the Higgs leading up to its discovery is very much a 21st century tale. It is the first major particle discovery to come under the scrutiny of the 24-hour news cycle; more and more particle physicists are starting their own blogs and talking candidly about their work, thus increasing and also diversifying the volume of information available to anyone who's interested.

Carroll embraces the 21st century identity of the Higgs, and his book is not only up-to-date but modern. He references the the Insane Clown Posse (who posed the question: "Magnets: how the *&@# do they work?") and an interview from The Daily Show with the man who said the LHC might eat the Earth; Carroll explains how the false-alarm internet rumors about the Higgs started and why they never panned out, and then somehow ties in the Mentos and Diet Coke experiment. Modern, and ultimately very fun.

You can find more from Sean in his first book, From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time, and at the blog Cosmic Variance.


  1. I don't think the qualities required for The Higgs particle to explain the standard model is there, and I don't think they will be found.

    Neither do I think, that supersymmetry will be recognized in futuristic science.

    I know I am a pain in the butt, but I believe in a complete different approach to high energy physics in the future. My vision is that future science will engulf consciousness. The mind and the spirit will be explainable through physics.

    I have been a fan of Sir Roger Penrose for many years. He was the first scientist to say that consciousness should be found in the quantum field rather than in the brain. I am so much a fan, that I made my own theory out of the idea that consciousness might be explained through a better understanding of antimatter and multiverse dimensions.

    My idea is that antimatter is the mirror of this universe, and that antimatter might be where memory is located.

    I think that the subconscious mind and consciousness are located in multiverse dimensions in the form of antimatter.

    The original standard model predicted no mass at all. That made no sence to scientists, so Peter Higgs predicted The Higgs Boson, purely from mathematics. I think the original standard model was right, particles does not exist. The physical universe is a flow of energy from minus infinite energy to plus infinite energy.

    If you would like to know more, then you can watch a full videopresentation of my theory on my blog:


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know: "What's going on in this video ? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream. (We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux ) Image Credit: St0rmz via Flickr Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?