Skip to main content

Neutrinos and antineutrinos might "disappear" differently, going against the standard model

Scientists working on the MINOS experiment at Fermilab say they may have detected for the first time a difference in the way muon neutrinos and antineutrinos disappear. If they're right, it could change particle physics as we know it.

[The MINOS experiment Far Detector, located in northern Minnesota. Photo credit: Jon 'ShakataGaNai' Davis.]

A fundamental of the standard model of particle physics called "CPT symmetry" requires that the way a particle and its antiparticle disappears be the same. The MINOS experiment has shown that this may not be the case.

When a neutrino or antineutrino disappears, it doesn't actually go away. Instead, it changes flavors. This change is known as an oscillation. MINOS studied the oscillations of both neutrinos and antineutrinos and found that they were different.

The difference may be a fluke, however, for a couple of reasons, says physicist William C. Louis who wrote a Physics Viewpoint about the research. It could just be a statistical fluctuation - a phantom in the data. Or, it could be due to the way the neutrinos' and antineutrinos' energies are measured.

MINOS will take more data in the coming years and study it for the same fluke. Several other experiments could also be tasked to look for the difference. Fermilab's SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments are currently doing joint analysis of their data on neutrino and antineutrino disappearances to see what they find. The IceCube neutrino detector, recently completed at the South Pole, also measures high-energy atmospheric neutrinos and antineutrinos.

If more experimental data shows there is a difference, it would mean that scientists might have to consider the possibility of physics outside the standard model. That, says Louis, would have a huge impact in the nuclear and particle physics world.

The MINOS (Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search) experiment at Fermilab detects neutrinos produced by the NuMI (Neutrinos at the Main Injector) beam. The experiment consists of two neutrino detectors, one, the Near Detector, a kilometer away from the NuMI beam near Chicago, Ill., and the other, the Far Detector, 735 km away in northern Minnesota.

The research was published in Physical Review Letters on July 5.


Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know: "What's going on in this video ? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream. (We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux ) Image Credit: St0rmz via Flickr Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?