Skip to main content

Can you learn quantum mechanics from a comic book?

The book currently on my nightstand is a slim, bright blue volume with the title Introducing Quantum Theory. It's part of the "Introducing…" series, which presents big ideas and great thinkers, such as psychoanalysis, Derrida, and Stephen Hawking, in a purposefully friendly, unimposing format.

I have to admit I was a little skeptical when I first cracked open Introducing Quantum Theory and was greeted with nine caricatures of the fathers of quantum theory, including a very balding Max Planck and a rather Neanderthal-esque Niels Bohr. Unlike most books on the subject, most of this little volume's text is in speech bubbles emanating from the mouth of famous scientists, drawn by the evocative and often humorous pen of Oscar Zarate. (Zarate is an accomplished comic book artist, perhaps best known for illustrating Alan Moore's "A Small Killing.")

This is not the usual approach to teaching quantum theory. But maybe it should be. In my first quantum mechanics class in college, a class aimed at preparing people seriously considering careers in physics, the professor presented the concepts of quantum theory almost as if they had been handed down by some all-knowing being. Equations went up on the board, as did graphs. But because quantum theory is a result of humans trying to understand the world they see around them, it really develops along a narrative path, driven by the actions and thoughts of key characters. Equations and graphs are absolutely necessary; it's essential to be able to grasp concepts mathematically and manipulate them with dexterity. But an equations-and-graphs-only approach artificially turns a wonderful story of how the world's greatest thinkers propelled a paradigm shift into a handful of numbers and symbols on an otherwise blank page. This approach also misleads students into thinking that somehow all of what they're learning should be obvious.

Wolfgang Pauli, one of the fathers of quantum theory.(CERN Pauli Archive)

It's not obvious, as Introducing Quantum Theory so ably illustrates. Quantum theory was a result of several people making observations that just didn't make sense, and is filled with tales of brilliant minds who desperately tried to avoid using the theory to explain the world; Einstein is famously quoted as saying, "God doesn't play dice." But he wasn't the only one who found quantum mechanics a hard pill to swallow. Max Planck struggled for years to find a classical explanation for black-body radiation's stubbornly un-classical curve. J.J. Thompson, a legendary classical physicist, bristled at the arrival of a young Niels Bohr who wouldn't stop pointing out that Rutherford's experiments obliterated his model of the atom as a pudding of positive charge with negative charge studded in it like raisins.

Introducing Quantum Theory fills in what most college classes fail to mention—the history of quantum mechanics is a great story, full of egos, denial, and radical ideas, and driven essentially by experiments. There's a vague sense these days that quantum mechanics has nothing to do with anything a normal person would care about. But something as mundane as a glowing coal clearly delineates the quantum world in the fact that it emits heat and light according to the blackbody spectrum that caused Max Planck so much existential pain.

Pauli, drawn by Oscar Zarate for Introducing Quantum Theory

The other very effective part of Introducing Quantum Theory's approach is the use of characters. A lot of individuals contributed bits and pieces to quantum mechanics as it grew from an embryo of an idea to a powerful predictor of the physical world. After a few pages of a physics textbook, these characters are reduced to a collection of names (usually German) and equations that quickly blur together. But when Schrodinger sort of looks like Keith Richards and Pauli like an evil Oompa-loompa, it's easy to keep them separated in your head. Also, lecturers and textbooks use equations, not physicists, as their main characters—they present the Schrodinger wave equation but not Schrodinger, the Planck constant but not Planck. It helps to know who these people were, why they were asking these questions, and where they got their ideas.

I gripe about traditional methods, but I have to admit that, even in a popular science book, I need a few equations and graphs to sink my teeth into. Luckily, Introducing Quantum Mechanics doesn't shy away from the essentials, but doesn't use them as a crutch. I'm thoroughly enjoying relearning the concepts of quantum mechanics in their proper place as part of a developing train of thought. In an ideal world, I'd like to see professors teach introductory quantum mechanics within its historical and human context; they might even find that less students fall asleep in their classes! Until then, universities might consider tossing students this comic book along with the standard dry text.


  1. Introducing Quantum Theory is a wonderful venture for modern perspective. Quantum theory's advance with algebraic topology is a pertinent subject, which coupled to the Schrodinger equation gives a close fit to unified quantum relative waveparticle mechanics. That is essential to research by the data density factor, which probes the horizon of picostructure where the solutions are waiting. The key to relevant advance, beyond optical AFM-SEM imagery, is the atomic topological function for electrons, energy and force fields, and waves/rays. It has recently been refined to the picoyoctometric, 3D, interactive video atomic model imaging equation named the GT integral.
    The atom's RQT (relative quantum topological) data point imaging function is built by combination of the relativistic Einstein-Lorenz transform functions for time, mass, and energy with the workon quantized electromagnetic wave equations for frequency and wavelength. The atom labeled psi (Z) pulsates at the frequency {Nhu=e/h} by cycles of {e=m(c^2)} transformation of nuclear surface mass to forcons with joule values, followed by nuclear force absorption. This radiation process is limited only by spacetime boundaries of {Gravity-Time}, where gravity is the force binding space to psi, forming the GT integral atomic wavefunction. The expression is defined as the series expansion differential of nuclear output rates with quantum symmetry numbers assigned along the progression to give topology to the solutions.
    Next, the correlation function for the manifold of internal heat capacity particle 3D functions is extracted by rearranging the total internal momentum function to the photon gain rule and integrating it for GT limits. This produces a series of 26 topological waveparticle functions of the five classes; {+Positron, Workon, Thermon, -Electromagneton, Magnemedon}, each the 3D data image of a type of energy intermedon of the 5/2 kT J internal energy cloud, accounting for all of them.
    Those energy data values intersect the sizes of the fundamental physical constants: h, h-bar, delta, nuclear magneton, beta magneton, k (series). They quantize nuclear dynamics by acting as fulcrum particles. The result is the picoyoctometric, 3D, interactive video atomic model data point imaging function, responsive to keyboard input of virtual photon gain events by relativistic, quantized shifts of electron, force, and energy field states and positions.
    Images of the h-bar magnetic energy waveparticle of ~175 picoyoctometers are available online at with the complete RQT atomic modeling guide titled The Crystalon Door, copyright TXu1-266-788. TCD conforms to the unopposed motion of disclosure in U.S. District (NM) Court of 04/02/2001 titled The Solution to the Equation of Schrodinger.


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know: "What's going on in this video ? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream. (We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux ) Image Credit: St0rmz via Flickr Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?