Skip to main content

Playing with Legos for Science's Sake


Physicist German Drazer drops a ball bearing into a Lego pegboard. (Will Kirk/JHU)


WASHINGTON (ISNS) -- Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have developed an unorthodox method to study the behavior of microscopic nano-particles -- by playing with Legos.


The team, led by physicists Joelle Frechette and German Drazer, built a grid out of round Lego blocks and immersed it in liquid glycerin to observe the paths of ball bearings they dropped into the construction.


Though Lego blocks are many times larger than a nano-device, particles passing through the grid behave fundamentally the same way, the researchers said. By increasing the scale of the experiment from nano to Lego size, researchers are able to better visualize, describe and ultimately predict the behavior of the particles that normally are far too small to see.






Many designs for nano-devices require the sorting of microscopic particles and ball bearings immersed in glycerin behave much the same way as nano-particles in microfluidic arrays. By determining the likely paths that different sized bearings take on the Lego board, the researchers can predict the paths nanoparticles of different-sizes, charges or textures in the microfluidic arrays.


The team recorded the paths of ball bearings descending through the Lego obstacles and found that the smaller bearings zigzagged randomly through the grid, while the larger bearings followed more deterministic straight lines.


The team's complete results were published the August 14th issue of Physical Review Letters.

—Mike Lucibella


Inside Science News Service



Results appear in the August 14th issue of Physical Review Letters

Comments

  1. There is a typo in the article header.
    It should read -
    "Playing with Lego for Science's sake."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe LEGO would prefer: Playing with LEGO Bricks for Science's Sake

    ReplyDelete
  3. LEGO™ demands that you immediately:

    1. remove all infringing content and notify us in writing that you have done so;

    2. credit all infringing content to ourselves in the following.... kidding.

    Mega Bloks suck though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 2nd confirmation that Mega Bloks suck.

    ReplyDelete
  5. legos eat mega blocks for breakfast.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LEGOS LEGOS LEGOS!

    *hides*

    ReplyDelete
  7. no one thought of "lego my eggo"?
    are we not men? are we d-e-v-o?

    ReplyDelete
  8. no one thought of "lego my eggo"?
    are we not men? are we devo now?

    ReplyDelete
  9. At least be consistant: half of the time you call it LEGO and the rest of the time you say Legos!
    (I believe that it is the former that is correct.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know:
"What's going on in this video? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream.

(We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux)

Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?