Skip to main content

Evolving Terms

No stranger to controversy, the word "evolution" was the star of a recently published paper by researchers from the Biology Department of the University of VA, Charlottesville.

Their paper, Evolution by Any Other Name: Antibiotic Resistance and Avoidance of the E-Word, takes the reader through a study of the terminology used by evolutionary biologists and medical researchers to describe the "evolutionary" process that leads to antimicrobial resistance. The researchers found that in evolutionary journals the word "evolution" was used to describe the process 65.8% of the time compared to 2.7% of the time in medical journals, which preferred terms such as emerging, increasing, and spreading.

The paper goes on to show that the use or non-use of the word evolution in a scientific paper is a good predictor of whether the word evolution is used in the paper's media coverage. The researchers conclude,

"Like gravity, evolution is an everyday process that directly impacts our health and well-being, and promoting rather than obscuring this fact should be an essential activity of all researchers."

I have to admit than I'm a little uncomfortable with this final leap. They make two assumptions in this last sentence that I don't believe they've supported in the paper:

1. Researchers have a responsibility to promote the relevance of evolution
2. Researchers are obscuring the relevance of evolution

Let me tackle number 1 first. In my opinion researchers have a responsibility to report their work accurately, beyond that I don't much care what words they use or don't use - as long as they are not giving up an accurate word for one that is less accurate.

And number 2, the paper provides no evidence that researchers are obscuring the relevance of evolution beyond the speculative statement, "It has been repeatedly rumored that both the NIH and the NSF have in the past actively discouraged the use of the word 'evolution' in titles or abstracts of proposals so as to avoid controversy."

As one responder to the article wrote, "It may be that those who want to describe the results of their research are reluctant to use the 'evolution' label simply because, to do so, does not say very much."

Something to think about...

Comments

Popular Posts

How 4,000 Physicists Gave a Vegas Casino its Worst Week Ever

What happens when several thousand distinguished physicists, researchers, and students descend on the nation’s gambling capital for a conference? The answer is "a bad week for the casino"—but you'd never guess why.

Ask a Physicist: Phone Flash Sharpie Shock!

Lexie and Xavier, from Orlando, FL want to know:
"What's going on in this video? Our science teacher claims that the pain comes from a small electrical shock, but we believe that this is due to the absorption of light. Please help us resolve this dispute!"

The Science of Ice Cream: Part One

Even though it's been a warm couple of months already, it's officially summer. A delicious, science-filled way to beat the heat? Making homemade ice cream.

(We've since updated this article to include the science behind vegan ice cream. To learn more about ice cream science, check out The Science of Ice Cream, Redux)

Over at Physics@Home there's an easy recipe for homemade ice cream. But what kind of milk should you use to make ice cream? And do you really need to chill the ice cream base before making it? Why do ice cream recipes always call for salt on ice?