Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Podcast: How a Telephone Company Revolutionized Science Outreach



Before Neil deGrasse Tyson; before Bill Nye; before Beakman and Mr. Wizard; before Carl Sagan—there was Dr. Research.

On the set of Our Mr. Sun (from left), Academy-Award winning director Frank Capra, leading Frank C. Baxter ("Dr. Research") and Eddie Albert (the first "Fiction Writer"). Image courtesy of Wesleyan Cinema Archives, via Eric Neiderost

"Dr. Research" (real name Dr. Frank Baxter), was the star of the Bell Science Series, from 1953 to 1964. The Bell series was the first science show to incorporate good storytelling, humor and visual effects. Other science shows at the time basically consisted of someone giving a classroom lecture. In other words, the Bell Science Series set the stage for just about every entertaining science show that came later.

The drastic change in approach was largely thanks to the vision of Cleo T. Craig, head of ATT at the time, and Frank Capra, who directed the first four films (modern audiences will be most familiar with Capra's directing work on the holiday classic It's A Wonderful Life.) Even if you're too young to remember "Dr. Research" Baxter, his legacy is important to modern science television.

This week on the podcast I talk with author and historian Eric Neiderost about his book Sonnets and Sunspots: "Dr. Research" Baxter and the Bell Science Films.

You can watch four of the Bell Science films online: Our Mr. SunThe Alphabet ConspiracyThe Thread of Life, and Gateways to the Mind.
From left, Frank Baxter ("Dr. Research"), Richard Carlson (the second "Fiction Writer"), and voice actor Mel Blanc (a squirrel in Hemo the Magnificent, but you know him as Bugs Bunny, Porky Pig and just about every other Warner Brothers cartoon voice before 1980). Image courtesy of Wesleyan Cinema Archives, via Eric Neiderost. 

Correction: I stated in the podcast that the first four of the Bell Science films are available to watch online. That's not the case. The four films that are available are linked above (they are the first, fifth, sixth and seventh films in the series); you can buy the second, third and fourth films on DVD
Read the rest of the post . . .

Monday, August 18, 2014

For Real-Life Transformers, Mix Paper, Batteries and Origami

Originally published: Aug 7 2014 - 2:00pm, Inside Science News Service
By: Charles Q. Choi, Contributor

(Inside Science) -- Disappointed that your Transformers action figures can't transform themselves? Researchers have created real-life transformer robots that can fold themselves from sheets into walking pieces of motorized origami.

Image credit: Seth Kroll, Wyss Institute

These new inventions could one day lead to sophisticated machines that can be shipped in flat boxes like IKEA-style furniture that assembles itself at home, or unfold in outer space for exploration, or deployed into confined spaces such as collapsed buildings for search-and-rescue operations. Origami-based engineering could also lead to lightweight, ultra-tough materials that can alter their mechanical properties on demand, scientists added.

Roboticist Sam Felton at Harvard University and his colleagues began investigating origami, the Japanese art of folding paper into complex structures, as a way to cheaply and quickly make robots. "When we tried folding robot designs by hand, we found it could take an hour even for an experienced user to do," Felton said. "So we decided to automate the folding so the robots could assemble themselves."
Read the rest of the post . . .

Friday, August 15, 2014

How Quantum Mechanics Helps Us Breathe

New insights explain how respiration does not result in asphyxiation.
Image credit: Antonio Guillem via shutterstock
Rights information: http://shutr.bz/1kivwqc
Why don't we suffocate whenever we try to take a breath? An international team of scientists has used quantum mechanics – the science that usually deals with events at the level of the ultra-small – to solve this human-sized mystery.

Read the rest of the post . . .

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Podcast: Hypervelocity Stars

Looking to hitch a ride out of the galaxy? You might want to buy a ticket on a hypervelocity star. These speedy sprites travel between one and two million miles per hour—fast enough to escape the gravitational pull of the entire galaxy. All stars in the Milky Way, including our sun, are moving: they orbit around the center of the galaxy. But those stars are going nowhere near the speed of hypervelocity stars. How do they get going so fast? A massive black hole, of course. Listen to the podcast to hear more about the science, the history and the future of these fast moving fireballs.
Read the rest of the post . . .

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Better Than Trek Technology

With the genre of science fiction, it can be fun to make comparisons between an imagined future and the current reality. A huge franchise in science fiction that seems rife for comparisons with modern technology is Star Trek. There have been various posts across the internet written about emerging technology inspired by Star Trek. But what about the technology we currently have in widespread use that's equal to or better than what's aboard the starship Enterprise?

Image Owner/Creator: Paramount Pictures. Posted by Jorg to Memory Alpha under fair use.
The fast answer: we don't have a lot that's leaps and bounds above what either Star Trek: The Original Series or Star Trek: The Next Generation imagined, but there are a few things that stick out. The bulk of the information about technology from Star Trek in this post come from Star Trek: Star Fleet Technical Manual and Star Trek the Next Generation: Technical Manual.

Read the rest of the post . . .

Monday, August 11, 2014

Best GRE Scores by Major — 2014 Edition

It's back to school season, and for many aspiring graduate students, it's standardized testing season. Future lawyers have the LSAT; doctors have the MCAT; but many graduate programs require a more general test: the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE).

Educational Testing Service (ETS), the company behind the GRE, administers a general test (with three sections) and a slew of section tests for areas ranging from physics to psychology.

The general test remains the most popular of ETS's offerings among both test-takers and admissions officers. And each year, ETS releases more data about how test-takers fared based on their intended graduate area of study.

As fans of friendly competition, we've compiled the data from the past three years into charts to arm those seeking bragging rights for their particular graduate school major. ETS has data for each section of the general test: Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning, and Analytical Writing. After checking out the data, be sure to note the caveats at the end of this post.

Note: Henceforth, any reference to "majors" or "students" (e.g. "philosophy major" or "economics student") will be referring to a student's intended graduate major because that is how ETS collects their data. While one's intended graduate major often correlates strongly with one's undergraduate major, they are definitely not necessarily one and the same; there's more on this in the caveats listed at the end of this post.

Verbal Reasoning


The verbal reasoning section primarily tests students' vocabulary and reading comprehension. When I reflect on taking this section, I fondly remember the esoteric words I had to learn, like soporific — meaning "causing or tending to cause sleep" and "of, related to, or marked by sleepiness."

Admissions officers for degrees in the arts and humanities tend to place more weight on this section than on other sections.

Data for tests taken between August 1, 2011, and April 30, 2014. These are simply a broad selection of intended graduate majors and do not necessarily represent the top 8 majors. For all intended majors, see the data courtesy of ETS.

Philosophy, as in previous years, was a clear winner in this category; the next highest-ranked major — the "other" category under ETS's Arts & Humanities section — scored a full two points below philosophy on average. As a physics blog, we have to give props to the aspiring physicists out there who scored an average of 156 on this section, beating out all other hard science majors (and many liberal arts majors).

For the verbal section, a 152 is the 50th percentile score, and the scores follow a mostly normal distribution. For reference, the average philosophy score on this section would be 84th percentile overall (the mean philosophy score was better than 84 percent of all test takers' scores).

Read the rest of the post . . .

Friday, August 08, 2014

Cell Phones are as Carcinogenic as Hammers . . . (*Updated August 13)

(See the updated section "Brain Cancer Trends" at the end of this article)

. . . which is to say, they are not carcinogenic at all. The analogy between the cancer risk that results from hammers and cell phones is better than you might imagine.


I only bring this up because, once again, a prominent TV doctor who apparently has no understanding of physics is pushing the idea that "we just don't know if cell phones cause cancer" and that you should go out of your way to avoid the unknown risk.

Well, Dr. Oz, that's simply nonsense. You may also just not know that gravity will continue to work tomorrow, and choose strap yourself to the ground out of an abundance of caution. Save yourself the trouble and the expense of your gravity-failure-prevention straps because, physics!

Read the rest of the post . . .

Wednesday, August 06, 2014

Podcast: The 2014 Flame Challenge Winner


Alan Alda started the Flame Challenge in 2012 to get scientists and science enthusiasts to explain complex topics to 11-year-olds. "What is a Flame?" was the first question, followed the next year by "What is Time?" The winner of this year's question, "What is Color?" was Dianna Cowern, aka Physics Girl, and we're talking to her on this week's podcast.





Read the rest of the post . . .

Monday, August 04, 2014

Splashing Droplets Can Take Off Like Airplanes

Originally published: Jul 28 2014 - 2:15pm, Inside Science News Service
By: Patricia Waldron, Contributor

(Inside Science) -- When a drop of liquid hits a solid surface, the liquid will do one of two things: flatten like a pancake or launch a halo of droplets into the air. It's a surprisingly complex and difficult-to-predict event.

Image credit: Nupur Das Gupta via flickr |http://bit.ly/1q9U6HQ
Rights information: http://bit.ly/1mhaR6e


The secret is in the air. By taking into account the gas surrounding the drop, researchers find that they can calculate just how fast a drop can travel without splattering when it hits. A new study suggests that after the drop strikes a solid surface, a tiny cushion of air carries along its edge as it spreads. The air provides lift like on an airplane wing and flings away droplets from the drop's edge.




Videos courtesy of Guillaime Riboux and José Manuel Gordillo

"People have been working on this problem since the end of the 19th century," said José Manuel Gordillo, a mechanical engineer who studies fluid dynamics at University of Seville in Spain and coauthor of the study. "There was a big controversy about the physics behind the condition that determines the splash."

Read the rest of the post . . .

Friday, August 01, 2014

Blast from the Past - Tinkertoys that can Walk, but Can't Stand Still

Standing humans aren't particularly stable. As most martial arts practitioners know, it doesn't take much to knock a standing person down. That's because, when standing, your center of gravity is above the point where you touch the ground and your feet provide a relatively small platform. If you tip even slightly, your center of gravity is no longer over your feet, and you either have to take a step or fall over.

http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/locomotion_and_robotics/tinkertoy_walker/tinkertoy_walker.mpg


If we aren't stable standing still, you might imagine that walking is that much more complex. But a paper in Physical Review Letters back in 1998 showed that some things that can't stand still at all can walk just fine.


Read the rest of the post . . .